Within the next month, the library will offer federated searching on a trial basis. This may lead many to ask a logical question, What is federated searching?
A quick web search for the meaning of federate brings back a useful idea: to federate is to enter into a league for a common purpose. In our case the common purpose is to find journal articles and the league is the universe of subscription-based and free databases.
Put simply, federated searching provides a single search interface to a number of predetermined databases. For example, users could search for articles on READING and AUTISM from a single search box and retrieve results from ERIC, PsycLit, Academic Search Premier, JSTOR, Project Muse, and the International Reading Association.
There is both an upside and downside to federated searching. The upside, from my perspective, is quite significant: uncovering information from underutilized sources that would be untapped otherwise. Given the investment the college and library have made in providing access to subscription-based databases, any resource that can maximize their use is welcome.
The downside of federated searching is that it can never be as powerful as searching one database directly. Special search features, such as a limit on population in PsycLit, are not available in a federated search. The common fields (title, author, subject, abstract) will be searched only.
Let this post serve as a teaser for what is to come. Once our trial is set up and available, I will provide additional information. In the meantime, check out these links for more:
What is federated searching?
The truth about federated searching.
Recent Comments